Rule Five Friday

2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (1)Well, it was bound to happen:  Florida Man Demands Right to Marry Computer.  Excerpt:

Chris Sevier, a man from Florida, believes he should be allowed to wed his Macbook.

Mr Sevier argues that if gays should be allowed to marry, then so should other sexual minorities.

Mr Sevier states he has fallen in love with a pornography laden computer.

2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (2)“Over time, I began preferring sex with my computer over sex with real women,” he told a court in Florida.

This appears to be not a passing holiday romance, but a lifelong commitment.

If gays have the right to “marry their object of sexual desire, even if they lack corresponding sexual parts, then I should have the right to marry my preferred sexual object”, he said.

Well then.

I’ve made my stance on social issues (including marriage) very plain in the past, and will do so again here:  I don’t give a damn what people do, as long as they leave me alone.  With that said, I am of the considered opinion – considered again after reading about the nutbar Chris Sevier – that marriage, to avoid becoming a complete farce, should be limited to consenting human adults.

2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (3)No matter how societal attitudes towards marriage have changed, it is still universally seen as a statement of deep commitment, entered into freely and willingly (at least in Western countries) by consenting, competent adults.  It’s not, as Mr. Sevier so fatuously complains, just an attachment “to their object of sexual desire.”

So is it “intolerant” to think that it’s appropriate to keep it within the species?

Actually, I suspect Mr. Sevier is attempting some sort of a stunt.   What point he is trying to make escapes us for the moment, but this 2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (4)doesn’t appear to be a serious person with a serious issue.

On the other end of the tolerance spectrum we have our “allies,” the Saudis; in the Kingdom the founder of a “Saudi Liberals” web site has been sentenced to 10 years in jail, a thousand lashes and fined one million riyals.  Why?  Read for yourself:

His website included articles that were critical of senior religious figures such as Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, according to Human Rights Watch.

2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (5)Mind you this is country that does not permit women to vote, drive, or leave their homes without a male relative as an escort.  Raif Badawi, the webmaster in question, originally also faced charges of apostasy – a crime that carries the death penalty in the Kingdom.

Civilized people do not conduct the business of state in this manner; but then, civilization has always been in short supply in this part of the world, at least for the last thousand years or so.

2014_05_09_Rule Five Friday (6)