Category Archives: History

Animal Magnetism LIVE Ep. 105 – Triple Feature


Also, some thoughts on Ranked-Choice voting:

And a look at the Ruger Single-Six.

Animal Magnetism LIVE Ep. 78 – Alaska Raptors/Double Feature


Bonus:

Animal Magnetism LIVE Ep. 69 – Happy Birthday, Alaska

Yeah, I’ll keep posting these, too. Enjoy.

Animal’s Daily History Made News

Before I get into this, be sure to check out the latest chapter of The Crider Chronicles – Confederacy over at Glibertarians.

Now then: Yesterday saw the conclusion of a political agreement that, as someone once said, is a big fucking deal. President Trump, in Egypt, signed the final copy of the Gaza Peace deal. If it holds, there will be peace in this troubled corner of the earth; for a while, anyway.

Yesterday morning saw everyone at RedState, yr. obdt. included, struggling to cover all the aspects:

President Trump Addresses Israel’s Knesset: ‘The Sun Rises on a Holy Land That Is FINALLY AT PEACE’

Watch: Trump Speaks on Hostages, Peace, Iran, and More

Amid Historic Peace Deal, Kamala Harris Chimes in to Remind Us What a Catastrophe We Dodged in 2024

Breakthrough: Trump, Middle Eastern Leaders Sign Historic Peace Deal

Watch: Trump Goes Off Script During Knesset Speech, and Everyone in the Chamber Goes Crazy

‘The Man This World Needed Most at This Point in Time’: Pakistan PM re: Trump at Egyptian Peace Summit

Trump Speaks to World Following Mid-East Peace Deal, ‘Have Achieved What Everybody Said Was Impossible’

Hot Takes: ‘Hell Freezes Over’ As Folks on the Left and on the Right Praise Trump for Peace Deal

Here’s the thing: This was a deal made with Hamas, who are lying liars who lie. They lie when they know we know they are lying. They know they are lying when they lie, and they lie knowing their are lying and that we know they are lying – and knowing that we know they are lying.

Beginning to get the idea?

I’m glad this is a done deal, and I agree with Pakistan’s president and quite a few other people who think President Trump should be a shoe-in for next year’s Nobel Peace Prize. We’ll see. But we should be aware that Hamas, along with their overlords in Iran, will view peace as only a time to re-arm, retrain, recruit, and plan their next attack.

It’s as I’ve been saying for some time now: There will be no lasting peace in Gaza until Hamas is no longer a factor.

Rule Five Civil Unrest Friday

I stumbled across this while cleaning up some old files, and given the state of affairs in our major cities in recent weeks, I thought it bore trotting out for you all to read again.  It may be more true now than it was in the 2020 “Summer of Love” rioting.

***

A comment on this article over at Glibertarians provoked some thought. Glibertarians is one of my favorite sites not only because they let me write about guns and outdoor stuff, but because the commentariat there is a good cut above the normal. The comment that got me thinking:

The social justice cadres suffer under the delusion that all of our social codes, all of our strictures on what we can do to one another are about protecting us from them. It doesn’t occur to them that it just might be about protecting them from us. Unremitting brutality isn’t some sort of exception or oddity in the course of human history. It’s historically been the utter norm.

Does anyone think, for a moment, that the men who settled continents, conquered the elements, and defeated any challenger who crossed their path established concepts like individual liberty, rule of law, or private property to protect themselves from bands of marauding purple-haired Women’s Studies and Literary Criticism majors?

Or is it maybe a little more likely that we’ve chosen to bury our more vicious and murderous impulses under a set of standards of bourgeois restraint? Now, they’re insisting that that veneer of restraint is unfair. Holy Shit! Have they thought for second about what their own damnation of bourgeois standards and values implies about the what they’ll be facing then?

Makes you think, doesn’t it?

It’s true that the vast majority of human history has been one of brutality, oppression and violence. That continued until fairly recently; the late 18th century saw, in Western Europe and the New World, the Enlightenment that led to one small group of people in North America proclaiming the blessings of liberty. But it’s true that you can see the endings in the beginnings; just as you can listen to Wagner and hear the roots of modern German death metal, just as you can look at Mozart and Freddie Mercury and see uncanny similarities, you can see a return to elitist brutality in the goals of modern statists:

“Liberty? You’ll have as much liberty as we allow you. Property? It’s only yours after we take what we want to redistribute it to others who haven’t earned it, after skimming off… well, a lot. Individual rights? You have the right to labor on other men’s behalves; the right to submit to the rule of your ‘betters’ for your own damn ‘good.”

They forget what kind of people set up those institutions that protect and defend liberty, property and individual rights. They forget how many people still value them today. They forget to what lengths people who decide they have nothing left to lose will go.  Strength, true strength, does not arise from outrage; it arises from work and achievement.  Confidence, real confidence, arises from the knowledge you can do things no matter what obstacles others try to put in your way.

How much longer will regular folks allow people to be intimidated by street thugs with black masks?  How much longer will people watch Berkeley cops stand by while those thugs run riot in the streets?  How much longer will it be before people have had enough, before the counter-protests become counter-attacks?  How much longer before the perpetually outraged suddenly, horribly, realize what wages their outrage has wrought?

The message to those who would tear down those institutions that define civilization – liberty, property, individual rights – I can only offer the warning voiced in that same comment: We’re not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with us.

Rule Five Doggie Emissions Friday

Sometimes you just have to wonder what the hell people on the left are thinking. Now it’s your dog’s impact on the climate. Yes, really. My good friend and RedState colleague Bob Hoge reported the other day on just that. Read:

Sometimes you can’t help but wonder: how do the progressive scolds who constantly shame everyone else for routine actions ever get out of bed in the morning with the burdens they carry? They worry they’re using too much water to brush their teeth, they can’t take a vacation because the emissions from the car or plane will cause the demise of us all, and the CO2 they emit with each breath spells disaster.

They constantly fret over the consumption of meat, the use of everyday household appliances that make our lives better, and any other progress that has brought our civilization into the 21st Century.

Now the Associated Press is highlighting the latest idiocy out of the National Academy of Sciences, which has determined that your pooch is contributing to the possible death of human society:

The top three individual actions that help the climate, including avoiding plane flights, choosing not to get a dog and using renewable electricity, were also the three that participants underestimated the most. Meanwhile, the lowest-impact actions were changing to more efficient appliances and swapping out light bulbs, recycling, and using less energy on washing clothes. Those were three of the top four overestimated actions in the report.

No one cares, AP.

This has to be the dumbest damn thing I’ve read in weeks – the AP’s hand-wringing, not Bob’s excellent takedown of it. Now Bob is a dog person himself, and so has some rather pointed opinions on these assertions:

If I were less polite, I’d tell them exactly where they can stick this study:

Why dogs have a big climate impact

Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to then raise cattle is a double whammy.

Tough shit, AP.

Look, you’re going to go precisely nowhere with trying to convince people to either give up Man’s Best Friend, or at least to try to get Fido to eat his veggies. Dogs are obligate carnivores; like cats, they need meat.

Besides, the relationship between humans and dogs is unique. Of all our domestic animals, dogs joined humans voluntarily, out of mutual benefit. One could argue that cats did as well, but as Rudyard Kipling so aptly noted, cats did so mostly for their own benefit. Dogs and humans both gain from being around each other; they help us hunt, they guard our homes, they love us unconditionally. I’ve always said, if anyone claims you can’t buy love, tell them to buy a puppy.

We’re keeping our mutts, AP. The climate will look after itself.

Happy Independence Day!

Happy Independence Day! I’m taking the day off – well, part of it, anyway. So enjoy this bit of patriotic totty, and stay tuned. Normal posts resume tomorrow.

Animal’s Daily Alcatraz News

Before I get started, check out the latest installation of The Crider Chronicles – Forest over at Glibertarians.

Now then: President Trump got the idea to re-open  Alcatraz, and I’m not yet sure what I think about that.

President Donald Trump wants to turn Alcatraz, a popular U.S. tourist destination, into a federal prison again, more than 60 years after the California island fortress was shut down as too costly.

Trump says Alcatraz, now part of the National Park Service, suddenly is needed to house America’s “most ruthless and violent” criminals. It’s where the government sent notorious gangsters Al Capone and George “Machine Gun” Kelly as well as lesser-known men who were considered too dangerous to lock up elsewhere.

“When we were a more serious Nation, in times past, we did not hesitate to lock up the most dangerous criminals, and keep them far away from anyone they could harm. That’s the way it’s supposed to be,” Trump said Sunday on his Truth Social site.

Here’s my question: Don’t we already have Supermax and other high-security prisons? Seems like it would be cheaper to extend Supermax, from which no inmate has ever escaped, not even in the movies.

Seems like we could give the taxpayers some more bang for the buck that way. President Trump’s been pretty good on bringing some slight semblance of sanity to the federal apparatus, but this seems like a boondoggle. I’d recommend a pass on this notion.

Animal Magnetism LIVE Ep. 44 – Alaska and Aviation

Animal Magnetism LIVE Ep. 43 – Alaska and a Famous Scoundrel