Facts are pesky, persistent things. Coleman Hughes has examined some facts, and ended up changing his mind on some things, to his credit. Excerpt:
Two things changed my mind: stories and data.
First, the stories. Each story in this paragraph involves a police officer killing an unarmed white person. (To demonstrate how commonly this happens, I have taken all of them from a single year, 2015, chosen at random). Timothy Smith was killed by a police officer who mistakenly thought he was reaching into his waistband to grab a gun; the shooting was ruled justified. William Lemmon was killed after he allegedly failed to show his hands upon request; the shooting was ruled justified. Ryan Bolinger was shot dead by a cop who said he was moving strangely and walking toward her; the shooting was ruled justified. Derek Cruice was shot in the face after he opened the door for police officers serving a warrant for a drug arrest; the cops recovered marijuana from the property, and the shooting was ruled justified. Daniel Elrod robbed a dollar store, and, when confronted by police, allegedly failed to raise his hands upon request (though his widow, who witnessed the event, insists otherwise); he was shot dead. No criminal charges were filed. Ralph Willis was shot dead when officers mistakenly thought that he was reaching for a gun. David Cassick was shot twice in the back by a police officer while lying face down on the ground. Six-year-old Jeremy Mardis was killed by a police officer while sitting in the passenger seat of a car; the officer’s intended target was Jeremy’s father, who was sitting in the driver’s seat with his hands raised out the window. Autumn Steele was shot dead when a police officer, startled by her German shepherd, immediately fired his weapon at the animal, catching her in the crossfire. Shortly after he killed her, bodycam footage revealed the officer’s despair: “I’m f—— going to prison,” he says. The officer was not disciplined.
For brevity’s sake, I will stop here. But the list goes on.
You might agree that the police kill plenty of unarmed white people, but object that they are more likely to kill unarmed black people, relative to their share of the population. That’s where the data comes in. The objection is true as far as it goes; but it’s also misleading. To demonstrate the existence of a racial bias, it’s not enough to cite the fact that black people comprise 14 percent of the population but about 35 percent of unarmed Americans shot dead by police. (By that logic, you could prove that police shootings were extremely sexist by pointing out that men comprise 50 percent of the population but 93 percent of unarmed Americans shot by cops.)
Instead, you must do what all good social scientists do: control for confounding variables to isolate the effect that one variable has upon another (in this case, the effect of a suspect’s race on a cop’s decision to pull the trigger). At least four careful studies have done this—one by Harvard economist Roland Fryer, one by a group of public-health researchers, one by economist Sendhil Mullainathan, and one by David Johnson, et al. None of these studies has found a racial bias in deadly shootings. Of course, that hardly settles the issue for all time; as always, more research is needed. But given the studies already done, it seems unlikely that future work will uncover anything close to the amount of racial bias that BLM protesters in America and around the world believe exists.
It’s nice to see someone discussing this issue that’s willing to use reason instead of emotion. It’s also rather refreshing to see someone that can change their mind when confronted by facts; that’s something we all find difficult at times. I’m certainly no exception.
Speaking of facts: As a biologist the entire concept of “race” in humans puzzles me a little. Well, more than a little. Humans – as in our species, Homo sapiens – once went through a population bottleneck, probably in the Middle Paleolithic; for thousands of years there may well have been fewer H. sapiens on the earth than their are orangutans today, maybe as few as 2,000. Why do I mention this? Because humans have, as large mammals go, very little genetic diversity. We have less genetic diversity than any of the great apes; less than chimps, less than bonobos, less than gorillas.
There’s an obvious answer: These aren’t racial differences, at least not as biologists understand this rather nebulous term. These are cultural differences. In the last few decades there has been a distinct tendency in our major cities to adopt what I can only describe as a toxic urban “thug” culture, one that sneers at education, glorifies violence, prompts young men to father children and not support them, to be violent and misogynist; this culture also glorifies substance use and the criminal activity that surrounds the black market of drugs.
That’s the problem. What’s the solution?
I can think of a few:
- Eliminate the “war on drugs” and the enormously profitable black market that results from it. This won’t solve the cultural issues around drug abuse, but it will go a long ways towards drying up all the violence around gaining and controlling drug-sale turf.
- Let urban parents send their kids to better schools. The teacher’s unions and their Democrat allies in Congress and state legislatures have squashed charter schools and voucher programs at every opportunity, while urban school districts lurch from failure to failure. Let the parents, not politicians, choose what’s best for their kids.
- Recognize that law-abiding urban citizens have the same right to self-defense, and the arms that make that possible, as citizens living in friendlier jurisdictions. Meanwhile, provide harsh penalties – and enforce those penalties – for those who use weapons in acts of violence.
The unfortunate police interactions we’ve seen lately are a symptom, not a cause. Even in the most libertarian society, there are behaviors that cannot be tolerated; we should stop tolerating them. The strange, violent “thug” culture of our inner cities is one of these.