Animal’s Daily News

FreakBrosGreetingCardMoneyNoDopeYesterday our old pal Rhino-san was still in town following our daughter’s Saturday wedding, so we took him on a tour of Denver.  One of our stops was intended to appease my curiosity, that stop being at one of Denver’s new legal recreational marijuana shops.

I dislike forming opinions about things I haven’t seen for myself.  As long-term readers of these pages and my old LiveJournal blog will know, I have long been an advocate of legalizing marijuana, not because I wish to use it (I don’t) but because I think it’s arguably silly to keep it illegal.  Drying up the profit appeal for criminals is a good thing, too.  But what I wanted to do yesterday was to see one recreational pot operation for myself, not because I wished to buy any (I don’t) but to satisfy my innate and often-overwhelming curiosity.

Obviously I took no photos, nor did I ask to take any, sensing that the shop employees would disapprove.  So I’ll describe the experience instead.

TheFabulousFurryFreakBrothersFirst, the entry:  There were two doors, barred by a young lady behind heavy glass.  The inner door was a heavy steel fire door, locked; the young lady behind the glass required your identification for examination before unlocking the inner door (no one under 21 is allowed inside for any reason.)  Our IDs were returned once we were inside.

The shop was clean, neat, well organized.  The employees were polite, friendly and well-informed.  There was a large, beefy but friendly young man seated on a chair in the corner of the small main room who had the distinct air of a bouncer.

As to the product:  Having had some passing acquaintance with marijuana in my irresponsible youth, I thought I had some idea to expect.   Not so!  Samples of the various types of recreational weed were arranged on tables around the showroom, and we were encouraged to open the jars and smell the product.  By odor alone I would have judged the product to be much, much stronger than the stuff I remember from the 1970s – and the young lady who we spoke with affirmed that weed has “come a long way since the Seventies.”

She was, incidentally, friendly, polite, and knowledgeable.  I had announced on entry that neither myself, Mrs. Animal or Rhino-san had any intention to purchase but were simply curious, and there never was any objection or any lack of attention paid to us because of that.

upinsmokeSo, impressions:  If a state is going to legalize recreational pot, this one store at least presented a reasonable way to vendor the legal product.  Security was tight, the employees were well-informed as to the possible pitfalls as well as the technical aspects of the weed.

I’m not sure what I was expecting from a legal weed shop, but what I saw wasn’t it – it was better.  So for now, my curiosity is appeased.  We may still debate the wisdom of Colorado’s legalized recreational pot, but the execution of the law – at least in this case – seems to be working.

Rule Five Friday

2014_06_27_Rule Five Friday (1)This is something that has been much on our minds of late.  Read Mental Illness And Crime: What The Legacy Of Dorothea Dix Hath Wrought.  Excerpt:

In the 1830s, jails were an all-purpose solution for a lot of issues. Inmates lived in squalor and people truly did not want to be there so there was a lot less crime. The downside was that nobody really cared about the people who did not belong there, like those with ‘retardation’ who had been abandoned, or people who were mentally ill but not criminals.

Dorothea Dix was the activist whose efforts led to the first generation of American mental asylums. At the age of 39, she happened to visit a local jail to do a Sunday school sermon for female inmates. She found that 2014_06_27_Rule Five Friday (2)criminals, retarded people and the mentally ill all lived together in terrible, unheated conditions. When she asked why, she was told  “the insane do not feel heat or cold”(Viney&Zorich, 1982). Not exactly evidence-based.

No, but here is something that is evidence-based:  All of the high-profile multiple murders committed in this country in recent years have a common thread, that being under-treated or untreated mental illness.  Adam Lanza should have been in an asylum; ditto for James Holmes.  (Islamist murderers fall into another category and belong not in asylums, but in graves.)

2014_06_27_Rule Five Friday (3)Too many people are walking around that shouldn’t be.  (Much of Congress and the Executive Branch may well belong in asylums, but that’s a discussion for another day.)  Upon a time these people would have been locked up – perhaps cruelly and in lousy conditions, but locked up.

Surely we can do better now?

Why do we not have a new breed of mental institution, where the conditions are humane, where the treatable can be treated and the untreatable maintained away from peaceable society?

The Science 2.0 article linked here concludes:

We have so many more mental patients in jails not because we have returned to the America of the 1830s, where the mentally ill are just thrown in jail so we don’t have to think about them, but because mental illness has been turned into a scientifically subjective loophole and therefore part of a cultural agenda.

2014_06_27_Rule Five Friday (4)The author is missing a cogent point.  We have more mental patients in jail because we do not attempt to remove potentially harmful people from society until they have already committed a crime.  Adam Lanza was known to be potentially dangerous.  So was James Holmes.  Why were they running around loose?

I make my living in large part by teaching high-tech companies how to do root cause analysis.  One of the ways you find a root cause is to look for commonalities in the circumstances of repeated events.  As noted, the common thread in the high-profile multiple murders we have seen lately is untreated or undertreated mental illness.

Until we address that, nothing else we as a society do will prevent another Adam Lanza or James Holmes from running amok.

2014_06_27_Rule Five Friday (5)

Animal’s Daily News

Sleepy-bearThe results of our Colorado primary elections are in.  Here in District 6 all of the Republican candidates for various offices were running unopposed, but the Governor’s primary was contested.  Former Congressman and former gubernatorial candidate (he lost to Bob Ritter in 2006) Bob Beauprez has emerged the winner.  Read details here and here.

What’s interesting about this whole contest is that the state GOP seems to be abandoning the circular firing squad they have been in for about the last ten years.  The Denver Post article (first link above) quotes one Beauprez’s primary opponents, the often-contentious Tom Tancredo, as saying to Beauprez on the evening of the election “I’m going to do everything I can for you, buddy, even if that means I don’t come around.”

Having met Tom on several occasions and having had the chance to speak with him at some length at least twice, I will say this:  Tom is an idea man, a great guy, a likeable fellow for the most part, but probably would not have been the best candidate to face the popular Governor John Hickenlooper.  Bob Beauprez will more easily appeal to a wide swath of voters in increasingly purple Colorado – and a key issue will be last year’s gun control laws, which are proving startlingly unpopular.

Peeking-Bear-150x99Still, the GOP has a long ways to go if they are to pick up the CO Governor’s mansion, and that way will be mostly uphill.  Bob may be the best candidate available – but John Hickenlooper is certainly the best Colorado Democrats have, too.

It’s going to be an interesting race.

Animal’s Hump Day News

2014_06_25_Hump Day
Happy Hump Day!

Random notes and observations today:

Michelle Obama:  I Will Not Go Into Politics After White House.  Well, that’s a relief – although she might just knock her husband out of the top spot for most ineffective and least capable pol of my lifetime.

Seriously, is there anyone out there with more than three IQ points to rub together who thinks this woman should be in elected office?  Her adult career has been a litany of patronage jobs and left-wing activism.  She has no accomplishments that would suit her to be mayor of a toxic waste dump, much less any office of any real consequence.  The best thing she could do for the country would be to enter into a comfortable (and, one would hope, silent) retirement beginning in January 2017.

Meanwhile, in Houston, a man has been ordered to remove his proudly displayed American flag because it is “a threat to the Muslim community.”  The proper response here would be to tell the complaining members of the Muslim community to go fuck themselves, but in fact there don’t seem to be any – the hyper-sensitivity is on the part of the apartment complex’s management.

There seems to be a distinct lack of testicular fortitude on the part of all too many people these days, but not this guy.  The Houston man in question, one Mr. Duy Tran, has replied that “I’m gonna leave my flag there, as an American, until she shows me proof that I don’t have the right to leave my flag there…I have friends that died for this country.”

clapping orwell

My Stetson is off to you, sir.

Finally, from the once and former Golden State:  One Party Rule No Party is No Party in California.  No shit.  Excerpt:

Forty years ago, Mexico was a one-party dictatorship under the Partido Revolucionario Institucional, hobbled by slow growth, soaring inequality, endemic corruption and dead politics. California, in contrast, was considered a model American state, with a highly regarded Legislature, relatively clean politics, a competitive political process and a soaring economy.

Today these roles are somewhat reversed, and not in a good way for the Golden State.

The times, they are a’changing – and not for the better.

On that note, we return you to your Hump Day, already in progress.

Animal’s Daily News

I have no idea what's going on here, but I want in on it.
I have no idea what’s going on here, but I want in on it.

Thanks once again to Robert Stacy and Smitty for the Rule Five callout!  Be sure to check out their extensive Rule Five compendium at the link.

So, is the Obama Presidency over?  Given the explosion in debt, the vast overreaches in executive authority and the lip-service approach to basic individual liberties, this Administration may not be “over” for decades. author Ira Stoll has some thoughts on the topic.  Excerpt:

We all will be living with the effects of his presidency for many years to come, long after the Obamas have retired to New York City and Martha’s Vineyard. Senator Rubio and Mr. Todd look at the president’s sagging poll numbers and see an impotent lame duck. But the reality is that even if President Obama doesn’t accomplish another new thing in the next two years, the actions he has already taken make him one of the most consequential presidents ever.

Over? Far from it.

The federal debt held by the public has grown on President Obama’s watch to about $12.6 trillion from about $6.8 trillion. The Obama presidency won’t be “over” until that nearly $6 trillion in new debt is either paid back or defaulted on. As a percentage of gross domestic product, the federal debt held by the public has soared to 73.8 percent today from 43.8 percent before he took office. The Obama presidency won’t be “over” until that figure returns to the status quo ante. Don’t hold your breath.

Treed BearLet’s be honest, at least amongst ourselves:  That figure (debt) will never return to the status quo ante.  It is the nature of government to grow ever larger and more intrusive, and our Republic has very likely reached a tipping point.  We may not be able to undo the coming fiscal calamity without hyper-inflation or repudiation of the Imperial Federal debt, both courses of action which would effectively destroy the United States as the leading economic power in the world.

There is a third option, of course.  It may not – may not – be too late to grow our way out of this.  But increasingly it looks like a return to fiscal sanity and a responsible monetary policy on the part of the Imperial Federal government is out of the question.

A lot hinges on the next two elections, and a lot can happen in the next two years; but republics rarely reverse course once started down this path.

And that path tends to end with tyranny.

Goodbye, Blue Monday!

Goodbye, Blue Monday!
Goodbye, Blue Monday!

Speaking of girls (which is frequently done around here) and in order to better appeal to the many and varied interests of True Believers all across the blogosphere, a little solicitation of feedback is in order.

The famed Saturday Gingermageddon posts have been a staple of this blog for some time, and on occasion we have changed things up with a Blondepocalypse, a Brunettenarok, an Asian Invasion or other themed Saturday totty post.  So, True Believers, let me know in the comments section – is there anything else anyone would like to see, theme-wise?  The only thing I don’t care for is celebrity photos, and things should be reasonably SFW.  Other than that I’m open to suggestions.

Or we could just keep going with redheads.

While you’re thinking about that, consider the more serious (and ominous) words of the always-worth-reading Dr. Victor Davis Hanson:  The Decline of Western Civilization in a Few Paragraphs.  Excerpt:

Every once in a while, a criminal case — consider the O.J. trial — reflects the immoral course of our current trajectory. Here is an ongoing local criminal case that pretty much sums up what is happening to our culture, laws, and society at large.

Perla Ibeth Vazquez, 27, is now on trial in these parts. On Oct. 21, 2011 (a mere two-and-a-half-years ago?), she was drunk, drove, and killed, according to the Fresno Bee, one “Frank Winslow, 54, a family man and truck driver for Foster Farms who was only a few miles from home when he was killed on Highway 168 near Ashlan Avenue.”

Sad-BearThe Bee added that the local prosecutor, Steven Wright:

[L]aid the groundwork by telling the jury that Vazquez had pleaded guilty to drunken driving in Tulare County in 2006 and again in Fresno County in 2010. Each time, a judge warned her that if she got drunk and killed someone, she could be charged with murder, Wright said.

By all means read the whole thing.  Yr. obdt. has on many occasions found reason to be grateful to not live in Californey – this is one more.  How the state’s justice system can fail so utterly is astounding – but then, California as a state is pretty much failing utterly.  This incident is just one more straw.

Rule Five Friday

2014_06_20_Rule Five Friday (1)Let’s talk about Iraq again, just for a bit, as things are still developing.  First up is this bit from the always-worth-reading Dr. Thomas Sowell:  A Bitter After-Taste.  Excerpt:

Some say that we should never have gone into Iraq in the first place. Others say we should never have pulled our troops out when we did, leaving behind a weak and irresponsible government in charge.

At a minimum, Iraq should put an end to the notion of “nation-building,” especially nation-building on the cheap, and to the glib and heady talk of “national greatness” interventionists who were prepared to put other people’s lives on the line from the safety of their editorial offices.

Those who are ready to blame President George W. Bush for everything bad that has happened since he left office should at least acknowledge that he was a patriotic American president who did what he did for the 2014_06_20_Rule Five Friday (2)good of the country — an assumption that we can no longer safely make about the current occupant of the White House.

I rarely disagree with Dr. Sowell and do not disagree with the substance of his assertions in this article, although in response to that last point in the excerpt I tend to think President Obama’s misadventures in foreign policy are probably better ascribed to ineptitude than maliciousness.  And let’s be honest, a good deal of that ineptitude was on the part of the previous administration as well, not least of which was the notion – as Dr. Sowell points out – that we could do nation-building “on the cheap.”

But the end result is the same – gains won at the expense of American blood and treasure are not dissolving, giving way to gains made by the very worst sort of bloodthirsty, Dark Ages-type savages.

So what to do?  Our pals at The Atheist Conservative have some interesting ideas on the matter.  Excerpt:

2014_06_20_Rule Five Friday (3)Yes. It would be greatly good if the savage fight now underway between two Muslim armies in Iraq, Sunni and Shia, could end in the destruction of both.

We quote from an article at American Thinker, by Mike Konrad, who argues the desirability of leaving the two sides to fight it out:

    I know, I know, the recent ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant) gains have everyone scared. No doubt, the Islamophilic administration will want to step in, and save Islam from itself once again.  Let me advocate a course of action that will make sense to all sides in America; the left and right; from militarists to pacifists: Let the Muslims kill each other. …

    ISIS is presently a large group of thugs with guns. They have no navy, no air force, except for a few captured helicopters, which they will soon break.  The only ones they can threaten are their fellow Muslims. If they take over Iraq, who cares? They will soon reduce the Levant to the seventh century.

2014_06_20_Rule Five Friday (4)Yr. obdt. approves – that may indeed be the best option for the United States to follow.  Let them kill each other, and by all means let Russia and China also attempt to wrestle with the Mesopotamian tar baby.  We’ve had enough.  There may even be some pieces to pick up when the dust settles – then again, there may not.

Either way, I think we’ve done enough.  There have been mistakes made in the past, but that’s past – and as that great American philosopher and sage, W.C. Fields, was known to state:  “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.  Then quit.  No point in making a damn fool of yourself over it.”

2014_06_20_Rule Five Friday (5)

Deep thoughts, news of the day, totty and the Manly Arts.