Goodbye, Blue Monday

Goodbye, Blue Monday!

Thanks as always to Pirate’s Cove and The Other McCain for the Rule Five links, and to Darkness Over The Land for the pingback!

Moving right along: Ever been frustrated by a left-lane vigilante driving exactly the speed limit in the left lane?  It seems that those speed limits may be based on some pretty outmoded science.  Excerpt:

In the US, our speed limits are derived from old studies, like this one from 1964 by traffic systems researcher David Solomon that looked only at rural roads in the 1950s. In line with conventional thinking, Solomon’s study fuels the premise that speed limits should be based on the speed at which 85 percent of the drivers on a road are maintaining. That means, if most cars on the highway are going 60 mph, that’s what determines the speed limit.

But with around 40,000 people dying in car accidents on American roads every year, something isn’t working, John Lower, a transportation engineer in California, told me. That includes the 85 percent formula, which traffic advocates have called for to be repealed. They’re calling instead for a data-driven system that reflects the actual traffic using sensor technology. In many cases, this will force us to drive slower.

Lower has spent decades as a city transportation manager, and now works at Iteris, an analytics company. He believes it’s time to reinvent the way we implement speed limits. “The way it works now, there are higher-than-expected crash rates along the system,” he said.

Lower’s solution is in line with Vision Zero, a network of traffic safety advocates he is part of, who want to use more recent data and technology to inform our speed limits. (The network is funded by entities including Kaiser Permanente, a health insurance company.)

In an ideal scenario, Lower said, we would be using smart sensors to collect the information from vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians to understand traffic flows. (A quick spin around the internet reveals multiple sensors are already on the market like this, including this one from Urbiotica and another from SMATS.) This data would then be analyzed to set speed limits based on the traffic flow, and the presence of the most vulnerable vehicles (bicycles) and people on the roads.

“Every traffic signal has to have some form of detection,” Lower added.

I have a question:  Who the hell is going to pay for all these detectors?

I’m generally in favor of using technology to make our lives better, but in this case, no thanks.  At present, our roads are publicly funded, and we don’t have the tax dollars to spare to be completely, totally revamping our system for determining speed limits.  Besides, improvements in car design have made driving much, much safer than it was in the 1950s – or even the 1970s.

For now, I’d say we should just stick with our good old-fashioned way of figuring speed limits.  And, on that note:

  • Salsipuedes

    Thank-you Mr Animal! We already have “slower traffic keep right” signs every few miles. These left lane lollygaggers must either be totally oblivious to everyone else around them (idiots), are they just don’t care (a-holes). You’ve hit on a pet-peeve of mine. I say start pulling them over and fine them heavily to reduce the deficit 😉

  • Andrew Pearce

    Since Obama got rid of all the old cars, and newer cars have all this computer gee-whizzery in them, really the only thing that keeps us from driving safely at 110mph is tire quality and following distance. Mandate speed rated high traction tires, put all the trucks – including 4x4s with mud tires – off in the slow lane, and set the auto-braking radar on the cars to keep a reasonable following distance at speed. And that distance is not the stupidity X car lengths thing that they taught at driver’s ed back in the 70s. I live in NJ; we drive at 83 on the good highways with less than 2 car lengths between vehicles. Stupid people cutting in, panic brakers, and unstable lifted SUVs screw it up. Otherwise, we’d churn right along at Autobahn speeds.